You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Yuan, Ling-Lin Zhang, Yu-Jie Lu, Meng-Yao Han, Ai-Hua Yu, Xiao-Jun Cai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,539,423
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#366
of 2,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,549
of 438,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.