↓ Skip to main content

Association between GDF5 +104T/C polymorphism and knee osteoarthritis in Caucasian and Asian populations: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between GDF5 +104T/C polymorphism and knee osteoarthritis in Caucasian and Asian populations: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0436-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong Jiang, Zengtao Hao, Dongsheng Fan, Wen Guo, Pengcheng Xu, Chao Yin, Shuzheng Wen, Jihong Wang

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease with a complex genetic background. Variants in growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) have been reported to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in several ethnic populations. The present study aimed to assess the association between the GDF5 +104T/C polymorphism and the susceptibility of the knee to OA through a meta-analysis of available case-control studies. The PubMed and Science Direct citation databases were used to search electronic literature in order to identify studies published between January 2007 and July 2016 that evaluated the association between the GDF5 +104T/C polymorphism and the susceptibility of the knee to OA. Different genetic models were used to assess the pooled and stratified data. A positive association was found in all pooled studies (OR = 0.808, 95 % CI = 0.754-0.866, p < 0.001). Regarding genotypes, significant associations were found using a dominant model (OR = 0.777, 95 % CI = 0.708-0.852, p < 0.001), a recessive model (OR = 0.723, 95%CI = 0.623-0.839, p < 0.001), and an additive model (CC vs TT OR = 0.648, 95 % CI = 0.552-0.760, p < 0.001; CC vs CT OR = 0.801, 95 % CI = 0.685-0.936, p = 0.005). Meta-analysis data were stratified by ethnicity, and the GDF5 C allele was found to be positively associated with OA of the knee in both Caucasians and Asians, as were the GDF5 TC and CC genotypes. In addition, using an additive model, the CC genotype was found to be significantly associated with OA of the knee in both Caucasians and Asians when comparing CC vs TT genotypes, but not in Caucasians when comparing TT vs CT genotypes. Meta-analysis results indicated that the GDF5 +104T/C polymorphism is a protective factor for OA among Caucasian and Asian populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,272,830
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#496
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,785
of 321,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.