You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intervention effects on physical activity: the HEIA study - a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
May Grydeland, Ingunn Holden Bergh, Mona Bjelland, Nanna Lien, Lene Frost Andersen, Yngvar Ommundsen, Knut-Inge Klepp, Sigmund Alfred Anderssen |
| Abstract |
Although school-based interventions to promote physical activity in adolescents have been suggested in several recent reviews, questions have been raised regarding the effects of the strategies and the methodology applied and for whom the interventions are effective. The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of a school-based intervention program: the HEalth in Adolescents (HEIA) study, on change in physical activity, and furthermore, to explore whether potential effects varied by gender, weight status, initial physical activity level and parental education level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 267 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 38 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 11% |
| Psychology | 25 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,310,962
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,258
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,658
of 291,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.