↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-3 (POISE-3): a randomized controlled trial evaluating tranexamic acid and a strategy to minimize hypotension in noncardiac surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-3 (POISE-3): a randomized controlled trial evaluating tranexamic acid and a strategy to minimize hypotension in noncardiac surgery
Published in
Trials, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05992-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maura Marcucci, Thomas W. Painter, David Conen, Kate Leslie, Vladimir V. Lomivorotov, Daniel Sessler, Matthew T. V. Chan, Flavia K. Borges, Maria J. Martínez Zapata, C. Y. Wang, Denis Xavier, Sandra N. Ofori, Giovanni Landoni, Sergey Efremov, Ydo V. Kleinlugtenbelt, Wojciech Szczeklik, Denis Schmartz, Amit X. Garg, Timothy G. Short, Maria Wittmann, Christian S. Meyhoff, Mohammed Amir, David Torres, Ameen Patel, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Kurtz Ruetzler, Joel L. Parlow, Vikas Tandon, Michael K. Wang, Edith Fleischmann, Carisi A. Polanczyk, Raja Jayaram, Sergey V. Astrakov, Mangala Rao, Tomas VanHelder, William K. K. Wu, Chao Chia Cheong, Sabry Ayad, Marat Abubakirov, Mikhail Kirov, Keyur Bhatt, Miriam de Nadal, Valery Likhvantsev, Pilar Paniagua Iglesisas, Hector J. Aguado, Michael McGillion, Andre Lamy, Richard P. Whitlock, Pavel Roshanov, David Stillo, Ingrid Copland, Jessica Vincent, Kumar Balasubramanian, Shrikant I. Bangdiwala, Bruce Biccard, Andrea Kurz, Sadeesh Srinathan, Shirley Petit, John Eikelboom, Toby Richards, Peter L. Gross, Pascal Alfonsi, Gordon Guyatt, Emily Belley-Cote, Jessica Spence, William McIntyre, Salim Yusuf, P. J. Devereaux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 47 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 48 60%