You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rationale, design and methods of VA-BRAVE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of two formulations of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder in veterans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13722-022-00286-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ismene Petrakis, Sandra A. Springer, Cynthia Davis, Elizabeth Ralevski, Lucy Gu, Robert Lew, John Hermos, Melynn Nuite, Adam J. Gordon, Thomas R. Kosten, Edward V. Nunes, Robert Rosenheck, Andrew J. Saxon, Robert Swift, Alexa Goldberg, Robert Ringer, Ryan Ferguson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 91% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,514,607
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#84
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,864
of 520,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.