You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The prevention of pressure injuries in the positioning and mobilization of patients in the ICU: a good clinical practice document by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s44158-022-00035-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Gianni Biancofiore, Salvatore Caiffa, Antonio Corcione, Gian Domenico Giusti, Pasquale Iozzo, Alberto Lucchini, Paolo Pelosi, Gabriele Tomasoni, Antonino Giarratano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 6 | 25% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 4% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,718,923
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#10
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,860
of 517,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.