You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative study of four immortalized human brain capillary endothelial cell lines, hCMEC/D3, hBMEC, TY10, and BB19, and optimization of culture conditions, for an in vitro blood–brain barrier model for drug permeability studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-8118-10-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela E Eigenmann, Gongda Xue, Kwang S Kim, Ashlee V Moses, Matthias Hamburger, Mouhssin Oufir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 463 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 120 | 25% |
| Researcher | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 106 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 13% |
| Engineering | 42 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 38 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 86 | 18% |
| Unknown | 108 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#133
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,599
of 301,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.