↓ Skip to main content

Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the establishment of HIV-1 latency

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the establishment of HIV-1 latency
Published in
Retrovirology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-10-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel A Donahue, Mark A Wainberg

Abstract

Latently infected cells represent the major barrier to either a sterilizing or a functional HIV-1 cure. Multiple approaches to reactivation and depletion of the latent reservoir have been attempted clinically, but full depletion of this compartment remains a long-term goal. Compared to the mechanisms involved in the maintenance of HIV-1 latency and the pathways leading to viral reactivation, less is known about the establishment of latent infection. This review focuses on how HIV-1 latency is established at the cellular and molecular levels. We first discuss how latent infection can be established following infection of an activated CD4 T-cell that undergoes a transition to a resting memory state and also how direct infection of a resting CD4 T-cell can lead to latency. Various animal, primary cell, and cell line models also provide insights into this process and are discussed with respect to the routes of infection that result in latency. A number of molecular mechanisms that are active at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels have been associated with HIV-1 latency. Many, but not all of these, help to drive the establishment of latent infection, and we review the evidence in favor of or against each mechanism specifically with regard to the establishment of latency. We also discuss the role of immediate silent integration of viral DNA versus silencing of initially active infections. Finally, we discuss potential approaches aimed at limiting the establishment of latent infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 11%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#864
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,953
of 291,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.