You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accelerated cardiac T1 mapping in four heartbeats with inline MyoMapNet: a deep learning-based T1 estimation approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00834-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rui Guo, Hossam El-Rewaidy, Salah Assana, Xiaoying Cai, Amine Amyar, Kelvin Chow, Xiaoming Bi, Tuyen Yankama, Julia Cirillo, Patrick Pierce, Beth Goddu, Long Ngo, Reza Nezafat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,409,624
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#954
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,441
of 518,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.