You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychological intervention for adults with long-term health conditions and subthreshold depression delivered via community pharmacies: a mixed methods evaluation—the Community Pharmacies Mood Intervention Study (CHEMIST)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-022-00992-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn A. Chew-Graham, Charlotte E. W. Kitchen, Samantha Gascoyne, Elizabeth Littlewood, Elizabeth Coleman, Della Bailey, Suzanne Crosland, Caroline Pearson, Shehzad Ali, Jay Badenhorst, Clare Bambra, Catherine Hewitt, Claire Jones, Ada Keding, Dean McMillan, Claire Sloan, Adam Todd, Paul Toner, Cate Whittlesea, Michelle Watson, Simon Gilbody, David Ekers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 53% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,200,230
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#240
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,781
of 520,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.