↓ Skip to main content

Assessing equity in health care through the national health insurance schemes of Nigeria and Ghana: a review-based comparative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
663 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing equity in health care through the national health insurance schemes of Nigeria and Ghana: a review-based comparative analysis
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-12-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

IsaacAO Odeyemi, John Nixon

Abstract

Nigeria and Ghana have recently introduced a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with the aim of moving towards universal health care using more equitable financing mechanisms. This study compares health and economic indicators, describes the structure of each country's NHIS within the wider healthcare system, and analyses impacts on equity in financing and access to health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 663 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 6 <1%
Ghana 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 644 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 162 24%
Researcher 71 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 10%
Student > Postgraduate 59 9%
Student > Bachelor 50 8%
Other 111 17%
Unknown 142 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 195 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 12%
Social Sciences 77 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 29 4%
Other 86 13%
Unknown 156 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#785,093
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#86
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,094
of 286,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.