↓ Skip to main content

Communication interventions to improve adherence to infection control precautions: a randomised crossover trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communication interventions to improve adherence to infection control precautions: a randomised crossover trial
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mei-Sing Ong, Farah Magrabi, Jeffrey Post, Sarah Morris, Johanna Westbrook, Wayne Wobcke, Ross Calcroft, Enrico Coiera

Abstract

Ineffective communication of infection control requirements during transitions of care is a potential cause of non-compliance with infection control precautions by healthcare personnel. In this study, interventions to enhance communication during inpatient transfers between wards and radiology were implemented, in the attempt to improve adherence to precautions during transfers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Gambia 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,875,655
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,247
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,484
of 285,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#20
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.