You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caregivers’ experience of sleep management in Smith–Magenis syndrome: a mixed-methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-02159-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgie Agar, Stacey Bissell, Lucy Wilde, Nigel Over, Caitlin Williams, Caroline Richards, Chris Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 67% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,690,037
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#343
of 3,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,348
of 521,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#12
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.