You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“H” is not for hydroxychloroquine—“H” is for heparin: lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and the role of heparin in COVID-19—preliminary data of a prospective and interventional study from Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-022-07110-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renata de Oliveira Costa, Joyce Santos Nascimento, Cadiele Oliana Reichert, Adriana Pedroso Augusto da Costa, Maria Aparecida Pedrosa dos Santos, Alberto Macedo Soares, Carlos Eduardo Mendonça Tomé, Ricardo Leite Hayden, Cassiano Waldanski dos Santos, Bruno Barreiro, Amer Abdul Basset El-Khatib, Luís Alberto de Pádua Covas Lage, Juliana Pereira, Mônica Mazzurana Benetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 11% |
France | 2 | 6% |
Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Comoros | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,983,919
of 25,204,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#532
of 8,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,065
of 516,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#22
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.