You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How can we consider variable RBE and LETd prediction during clinical practice? A pediatric case report at the Normandy Proton Therapy Centre using an independent dose engine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-021-01960-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stewart Mein, Benedikt Kopp, Anthony Vela, Pauline Dutheil, Paul Lesueur, Dinu Stefan, Jürgen Debus, Thomas Haberer, Amir Abdollahi, Andrea Mairani, Thomas Tessonnier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,460,239
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#420
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,952
of 504,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.