You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Investigation of the potentiation of the analgesic effects of fentanyl by ketamine in humans: a double-blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study of experimental pain[ISRCTN83088383]
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, April 2005
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-5-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam P Tucker, Yong Ik Kim, Raymond Nadeson, Colin S Goodchild |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 19% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2011.
All research outputs
#7,488,078
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#307
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,770
of 59,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them