You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inter-jurisdictional cooperation on pharmaceutical product listing agreements: views from Canadian provinces
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-34 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven G Morgan, Paige A Thomson, Jamie R Daw, Melissa K Friesen |
Abstract |
Confidential product listing agreements (PLAs) negotiated between pharmaceutical manufacturers and individual health care payers may contribute to unwanted price disparities, high administrative costs, and unequal bargaining power within and across jurisdictions. In the context of Canada's decentralized health system, we aimed to document provincial policy makers' perceptions about collaborative PLA negotiations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 75% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 21% |
Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,738,077
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,176
of 7,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,831
of 282,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#13
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.