↓ Skip to main content

Geostatistical analysis of disease data: accounting for spatial support and population density in the isopleth mapping of cancer mortality risk using area-to-point Poisson kriging

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geostatistical analysis of disease data: accounting for spatial support and population density in the isopleth mapping of cancer mortality risk using area-to-point Poisson kriging
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-5-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Goovaerts

Abstract

Geostatistical techniques that account for spatially varying population sizes and spatial patterns in the filtering of choropleth maps of cancer mortality were recently developed. Their implementation was facilitated by the initial assumption that all geographical units are the same size and shape, which allowed the use of geographic centroids in semivariogram estimation and kriging. Another implicit assumption was that the population at risk is uniformly distributed within each unit. This paper presents a generalization of Poisson kriging whereby the size and shape of administrative units, as well as the population density, is incorporated into the filtering of noisy mortality rates and the creation of isopleth risk maps. An innovative procedure to infer the point-support semivariogram of the risk from aggregated rates (i.e. areal data) is also proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 108 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 13%
Mathematics 14 11%
Environmental Science 14 11%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#538
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,182
of 168,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.