↓ Skip to main content

E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
374 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
791 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Human Resources for Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seble Frehywot, Yianna Vovides, Zohray Talib, Nadia Mikhail, Heather Ross, Hannah Wohltjen, Selam Bedada, Kristine Korhumel, Abdel Karim Koumare, James Scott

Abstract

In the face of severe faculty shortages in resource-constrained countries, medical schools look to e-learning for improved access to medical education. This paper summarizes the literature on e-learning in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and presents the spectrum of tools and strategies used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 791 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 772 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 14%
Researcher 77 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 9%
Student > Bachelor 60 8%
Student > Postgraduate 50 6%
Other 231 29%
Unknown 194 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 246 31%
Social Sciences 77 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 7%
Computer Science 55 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 3%
Other 118 15%
Unknown 217 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,882,661
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#182
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,828
of 291,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.