You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying a gender lens on human papillomavirus infection: cervical cancer screening, HPV DNA testing, and HPV vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-12-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivan Branković, Petra Verdonk, Ineke Klinge |
| Abstract |
Our aim is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of knowledge on sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) aspects of Human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer for educational purposes. Considerable disparities exist in cervical cancer incidences between different subgroups of women. We provide an outline on the crucial issues and debates based on the recent literature published in leading gender medicine journals. Intersectionality was applied in order to help categorise the knowledge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 10% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,884,674
of 23,913,510 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,215
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,125
of 289,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#38
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,913,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.