↓ Skip to main content

A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (APPAC trial)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,316)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (APPAC trial)
Published in
BMC Surgery, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-13-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannu Paajanen, Juha M Grönroos, Tero Rautio, Pia Nordström, Markku Aarnio, Tuomo Rantanen, Saija Hurme, Kirsti Dean, Airi Jartti, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Juhani Sand, Paulina Salminen

Abstract

Although the standard treatment of acute appendicitis (AA) consists of an early appendectomy, there has recently been both an interest and an increase in the use of antibiotic therapy as the primary treatment for uncomplicated AA. However, the use of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated AA is still controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 168 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,086,936
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#16
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,585
of 284,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.