You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Potential use of low-copy nuclear genes in DNA barcoding: a comparison with plastid genes in two Hawaiian plant radiations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-13-35 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yohan Pillon, Jennifer Johansen, Tomoko Sakishima, Srikar Chamala, W Brad Barbazuk, Eric H Roalson, Donald K Price, Elizabeth A Stacy |
Abstract |
DNA barcoding of land plants has relied traditionally on a small number of markers from the plastid genome. In contrast, low-copy nuclear genes have received little attention as DNA barcodes because of the absence of universal primers for PCR amplification. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Cameroon | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 72 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 29% |
Researcher | 18 | 22% |
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Professor | 4 | 5% |
Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 74% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,221,195
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,183
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,066
of 296,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#64
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.