You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting non-isometric fatigue induced by electrical stimulation pulse trains as a function of pulse duration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Susan Marion, Anthony S Wexler, Maury L Hull |
| Abstract |
Our previous model of the non-isometric muscle fatigue that occurs during repetitive functional electrical stimulation included models of force, motion, and fatigue and accounted for applied load but not stimulation pulse duration. Our objectives were to: 1) further develop, 2) validate, and 3) present outcome measures for a non-isometric fatigue model that can predict the effect of a range of pulse durations on muscle fatigue. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 35% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,182,546
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,136
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,663
of 282,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#40
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.