You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genotyping 1000 yeast strains by next-generation sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-90 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefan Wilkening, Manu M Tekkedil, Gen Lin, Emilie S Fritsch, Wu Wei, Julien Gagneur, David W Lazinski, Andrew Camilli, Lars M Steinmetz |
Abstract |
The throughput of next-generation sequencing machines has increased dramatically over the last few years; yet the cost and time for library preparation have not changed proportionally, thus representing the main bottleneck for sequencing large numbers of samples. Here we present an economical, high-throughput library preparation method for the Illumina platform, comprising a 96-well based method for DNA isolation for yeast cells, a low-cost DNA shearing alternative, and adapter ligation using heat inactivation of enzymes instead of bead cleanups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
Germany | 2 | 7% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Grenada | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 15 | 56% |
Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Spain | 3 | 1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 188 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 64 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 25% |
Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 64% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 19% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,101,940
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#545
of 11,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,251
of 294,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#24
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.