↓ Skip to main content

Cost analyses of obesity in Canada: scope, quality, and implications

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost analyses of obesity in Canada: scope, quality, and implications
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-11-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bach Xuan Tran, Amrita V Nair, Stefan Kuhle, Arto Ohinmaa, Paul J Veugelers

Abstract

Rapid changes in lifestyle have led to a global obesity epidemic. Understanding the economic burden associated with the obesity epidemic is essential to decision making of cost-effective interventions. This study reviewed costs of obesity and intervention programs in Canada, assessed the scope and quality of existing cost analyses, and identified implications for economic evaluations and public health decision makers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 25%
Student > Bachelor 34 21%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Psychology 9 5%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#248
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,097
of 292,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.