You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual guidance structure for evaluation of patients with unclear diagnosis in centers for rare diseases (ZSE-DUO): study protocol for a controlled multi-center cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-022-02176-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helge Hebestreit, Cornelia Zeidler, Christopher Schippers, Martina de Zwaan, Jürgen Deckert, Peter Heuschmann, Christian Krauth, Monika Bullinger, Alexandra Berger, Mark Berneburg, Lilly Brandstetter, Anna Deibele, Jan Dieris-Hirche, Holm Graessner, Harald Gündel, Stephan Herpertz, Gereon Heuft, Anne-Marie Lapstich, Thomas Lücke, Tim Maisch, Christine Mundlos, Andrea Petermann-Meyer, Susanne Müller, Stephan Ott, Lisa Pfister, Julia Quitmann, Marcel Romanos, Frank Rutsch, Kristina Schaubert, Katharina Schubert, Jörg B. Schulz, Susann Schweiger, Oliver Tüscher, Kathrin Ungethüm, Thomas O. F. Wagner, Kirsten Haas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,655,010
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,128
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,626
of 522,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#37
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.