You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
De-escalation of conflict in forensic mental health inpatient settings: a Theoretical Domains Framework-informed qualitative investigation of staff and patient perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40359-022-00735-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isobel Johnston, Owen Price, Peter McPherson, Christopher J. Armitage, Helen Brooks, Penny Bee, Karina Lovell, Cat Papastavrou Brooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,881,801
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#194
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,002
of 552,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 552,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.