↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Validation of a method of broth microdilution for the determination of antibacterial activity of essential oils

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Validation of a method of broth microdilution for the determination of antibacterial activity of essential oils
Published in
BMC Research Notes, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13104-022-05915-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Vanegas, Andrea Abril-Novillo, Aleksandr Khachatryan, Lourdes Jerves-Andrade, Eugenia Peñaherrera, Nancy Cuzco, Isabel Wilches, Jessica Calle, Fabián León-Tamariz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,572,469
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,334
of 4,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,296
of 519,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#33
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.