You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Policy and practice impacts of applied research: a case study analysis of the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme 2000–2006
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-11-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J Milat, Rachel Laws, Lesley King, Robyn Newson, Lucie Rychetnik, Chris Rissel, Adrian E Bauman, Sally Redman, Jason Bennie |
| Abstract |
Intervention research provides important information regarding feasible and effective interventions for health policy makers, but few empirical studies have explored the mechanisms by which these studies influence policy and practice. This study provides an exploratory case series analysis of the policy, practice and other related impacts of the 15 research projects funded through the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme during the period 2000 to 2006, and explored the factors mediating impacts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2013.
All research outputs
#13,681,545
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#982
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,376
of 282,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.