↓ Skip to main content

Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
11 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-1-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim F Huggett, Tanya Novak, Jeremy A Garson, Clare Green, Stephen D Morris-Jones, Robert F Miller, Alimuddin Zumla

Abstract

PCR inhibition by nucleic acid extracts is a well known yet poorly described phenomenon. Inhibition assessment generally depends on the assumption that inhibitors affect all PCR reactions to the same extent; i.e. that the reaction of interest and the control reaction are equally susceptible to inhibition. To test this assumption we performed inhibition assessment on DNA extracts from human urine samples, fresh urine and EDTA using different PCR reactions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 263 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 18%
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 52 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Engineering 15 5%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 62 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,074,378
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#251
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,476
of 95,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them