↓ Skip to main content

Residual symptoms and functioning in depression, does the type of residual symptom matter? A post-hoc analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Residual symptoms and functioning in depression, does the type of residual symptom matter? A post-hoc analysis
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene Romera, Víctor Pérez, Antonio Ciudad, Luis Caballero, Miguel Roca, Pepa Polavieja, Inmaculada Gilaberte

Abstract

The degrees to which residual symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) adversely affect patient functioning is not known. This post-hoc analysis explored the association between different residual symptoms and patient functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Psychology 12 18%
Neuroscience 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,931,785
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,259
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,828
of 293,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#69
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.