You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synthesising the existing evidence for non-pharmacological interventions targeting outcomes relevant to young people with ADHD in the school setting: systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-01902-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abigail E. Russell, Darren Moore, Amy Sanders, Barnaby Dunn, Rachel Hayes, Judi Kidger, Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Linda Pfiffner, Tamsin Ford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 64% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,112,937
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#817
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,785
of 440,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.