You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Repeated endo-tracheal tube disconnection generates pulmonary edema in a model of volume overload: an experimental study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03924-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bhushan H. Katira, Doreen Engelberts, Sheena Bouch, Jordan Fliss, Luca Bastia, Kohei Osada, Kim A. Connelly, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Niall D. Ferguson, Wolfgang M. Kuebler, Brian P. Kavanagh, Laurent J. Brochard, Martin Post |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Italy | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,143,691
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#933
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,743
of 450,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#28
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.