You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Actively implementing an evidence-based feeding guideline for critically ill patients (NEED): a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03921-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lu Ke, Jiajia Lin, Gordon S. Doig, Arthur R. H. van Zanten, Yang Wang, Juan Xing, Zhongheng Zhang, Tao Chen, Lixin Zhou, Dongpo Jiang, Qindong Shi, Jiandong Lin, Jun Liu, Aibin Cheng, Yafeng Liang, Peiyang Gao, Junli Sun, Wenming Liu, Zhenyu Yang, Rumin Zhang, Wei Xing, An Zhang, Zhigang Zhou, Tingfa Zhou, Yang Liu, Fei Tong, Qiuhui Wang, Aijun Pan, Xiaobo Huang, Chuming Fan, Weihua Lu, Dongwu Shi, Lei Wang, Wei Li, Liming Gu, Yingguang Xie, Rongqing Sun, Feng Guo, Lin Han, Lihua Zhou, Xiangde Zheng, Feng Shan, Jianbo Liu, Yuhang Ai, Yan Qu, Liandi Li, Hailing Li, Zhiguo Pan, Donglin Xu, Zhiqiang Zou, Yan Gao, Chunli Yang, Qiuye Kou, Xijing Zhang, Jinglan Wu, Chuanyun Qian, Weixing Zhang, Minjie Zhang, Yuan Zong, Bingyu Qin, Fusen Zhang, Zhe Zhai, Yun Sun, Ping Chang, Bo Yu, Min Yu, Shiying Yuan, Yijun Deng, Liyun Zhao, Bin Zang, Yuanfei Li, Fachun Zhou, Xiaomei Chen, Min Shao, Weidong Wu, Ming Wu, Zhaohui Zhang, Yimin Li, Qiang Guo, Zhiyong Wang, Yuanqi Gong, Yunlin Song, Kejian Qian, Yongjian Feng, Baocai Fu, Xueyan Liu, Zhiping Li, Chuanyong Gong, Cheng Sun, Jian Yu, Zhongzhi Tang, Linxi Huang, Biao Ma, Zhijie He, Qingshan Zhou, Rongguo Yu, Zhihui Tong, Weiqin Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,753,415
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,541
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,469
of 448,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.