↓ Skip to main content

Rare coding variants in RCN3 are associated with blood pressure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare coding variants in RCN3 are associated with blood pressure
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12864-022-08356-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Y. He, Tanika N. Kelly, Heming Wang, Jingjing Liang, Luke Zhu, Brian E. Cade, Themistocles L. Assimes, Lewis C. Becker, Amber L. Beitelshees, Lawrence F. Bielak, Adam P. Bress, Jennifer A. Brody, Yen-Pei Christy Chang, Yi-Cheng Chang, Paul S. de Vries, Ravindranath Duggirala, Ervin R. Fox, Nora Franceschini, Anna L. Furniss, Yan Gao, Xiuqing Guo, Jeffrey Haessler, Yi-Jen Hung, Shih-Jen Hwang, Marguerite Ryan Irvin, Rita R. Kalyani, Ching-Ti Liu, Chunyu Liu, Lisa Warsinger Martin, May E. Montasser, Paul M. Muntner, Stanford Mwasongwe, Take Naseri, Walter Palmas, Muagututi’a Sefuiva Reupena, Kenneth M. Rice, Wayne H.-H. Sheu, Daichi Shimbo, Jennifer A. Smith, Beverly M. Snively, Lisa R. Yanek, Wei Zhao, John Blangero, Eric Boerwinkle, Yii-Der Ida Chen, Adolfo Correa, L. Adrienne Cupples, Joanne E. Curran, Myriam Fornage, Jiang He, Lifang Hou, Robert C. Kaplan, Sharon L. R. Kardia, Eimear E. Kenny, Charles Kooperberg, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Ruth J. F. Loos, Rasika A. Mathias, Stephen T. McGarvey, Braxton D. Mitchell, Kari E. North, Patricia A. Peyser, Bruce M. Psaty, Laura M. Raffield, D. C. Rao, Susan Redline, Alex P. Reiner, Stephen S. Rich, Jerome I. Rotter, Kent D. Taylor, Russell Tracy, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Alanna C. Morrison, Daniel Levy, Aravinda Chakravarti, Donna K. Arnett, Xiaofeng Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,616,848
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,646
of 10,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,872
of 439,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#47
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.