↓ Skip to main content

Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01536-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina Weise, Roland Brian Büchter, Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,288,566
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#649
of 2,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,410
of 451,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#20
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.