You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bridie Angela Evans, Helen Snooks, Helen Howson, Myfanwy Davies |
| Abstract |
Although an evidence-based approach is the ideal model for planning and delivering healthcare, barriers exist to using research evidence to implement and evaluate service change. This paper aims to inform policy implementation and evaluation by understanding the role of research evidence at the local level through implementation of a national chronic conditions management policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 126 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
| Psychology | 13 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 134 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#1,725,200
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#353
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,913
of 291,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.