You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving peripheral venous cannula insertion in children: a mixed methods study to develop the DIVA key
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-022-07605-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica A. Schults, Tricia M. Kleidon, Victoria Gibson, Robert S. Ware, Emily Monteagle, Rebecca Paterson, Karina Charles, Adam Keys, Craig A. McBride, Steven McTaggart, Benjamin Lawton, Fiona Macfarlane, Chloe Sells, Claire M. Rickard, Amanda J. Ullman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 59% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,153,934
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,818
of 7,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,525
of 439,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#71
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.