You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using infrared eye-tracking to explore ordinal numerical processing in toddlers with Fragile X Syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1866-1955-5-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily R Owen, Heidi A Baumgartner, Susan M Rivera |
Abstract |
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common cause of inherited intellectual disability and non-idiopathic autism. Individuals with FXS present with a behavioral phenotype of specific and selective deficits in an array of cognitive skills. Disruption of number processing and arithmetic abilities in higher-functioning adults and female adolescents with FXS has been well established. Still, both numerical skills and developmentally antecedent cognitive processes have just begun to be investigated in toddlers with FXS. The goal of the current study was to assess how very young children with FXS respond to ordinal relationships among numerical magnitudes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 28 | 35% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,254,926
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#240
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,643
of 287,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.