You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Harvested area did not increase abruptly—how advancements in satellite-based mapping led to erroneous conclusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13595-022-01120-4 |
| Authors |
Johannes Breidenbach, David Ellison, Hans Petersson, Kari T. Korhonen, Helena M. Henttonen, Jörgen Wallerman, Jonas Fridman, Terje Gobakken, Rasmus Astrup, Erik Næsset |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Norway | 5 | 8% |
| Sweden | 5 | 8% |
| Finland | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Poland | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 75% |
| Scientists | 12 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#597,069
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#3
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,189
of 452,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.