↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Correlation between intraoperative and postoperative vaulting of the EVO implantable Collamer lens: a retrospective study of real-time observations of vaulting using the RESCAN 700…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Correlation between intraoperative and postoperative vaulting of the EVO implantable Collamer lens: a retrospective study of real-time observations of vaulting using the RESCAN 700 system
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12886-022-02259-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nian Guan, Xiao-Nong Zhang, Wan-Jun Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,052,658
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#1,113
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,014
of 441,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#53
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.