You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective biodegradation of chicken feather waste by co-cultivation of keratinase producing strains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Cell Factories, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12934-019-1134-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zheng Peng, Xinzhe Mao, Juan Zhang, Guocheng Du, Jian Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 83 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,480,713
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#538
of 1,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,104
of 350,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.