You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lessons to be learned: identifying high-risk medication and circumstances in patients at risk for suicidal self-poisoning
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13033-021-00513-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefanie Geith, Christiane Didden, Christian Rabe, Tobias Zellner, Armin Ott, Florian Eyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,862,369
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#338
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,026
of 506,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.