↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas J Vereecken, Salvatore Cozzolino, Florian P Schiestl

Abstract

Sexually deceptive orchids of the genus Ophrys attract their pollinators, male insects, on a highly specific basis through the emission of odour blends that mimic the female sex pheromone of the targeted species. In this study, we have investigated a contact site between Ophrys arachnitiformis and O. lupercalis, two sympatric orchid species that are usually reproductively isolated via the exploitation of different pollinator "niches", but occasionally hybridise despite their apparent combination of ethological and mechanical isolation barriers. In particular, we have investigated the extent to which these Ophrys hybrids generate "emergent" combinations (i.e. novel and unpredictable from the parents' phenotypes) of floral traits, and how these phenotypic novelties, particularly the odour blends emitted by the flower, could facilitate the invasion of a novel pollinator "niche" and induce the rapid formation of reproductive isolation, a prerequisite for adaptive evolutionary divergence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 4 2%
India 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Réunion 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 147 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 23%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Professor 15 9%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 66%
Environmental Science 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,274,513
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#874
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,512
of 103,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.