↓ Skip to main content

Gait training assisted by multi-channel functional electrical stimulation early after stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gait training assisted by multi-channel functional electrical stimulation early after stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1604-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maijke van Bloemendaal, Sicco A. Bus, Charlotte E. de Boer, Frans Nollet, Alexander C. H. Geurts, Anita Beelen

Abstract

Many stroke survivors suffer from paresis of lower limb muscles, resulting in compensatory gait patterns characterised by asymmetries in spatial and temporal parameters and reduced walking capacity. Functional electrical stimulation has been used to improve walking capacity, but evidence is mostly limited to the orthotic effects of peroneal functional electrical stimulation in the chronic phase after stroke. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effects of up to 10 weeks of multi-channel functional electrical stimulation (MFES)-assisted gait training on the restoration of spatiotemporal gait symmetry and walking capacity in subacute stroke patients. In a proof-of-principle study with a randomised controlled design, 40 adult patients with walking deficits who are admitted for inpatient rehabilitation within 31 days since the onset of stroke are randomised to either MFES-assisted gait training or conventional gait training. Gait training is delivered in 30-minute sessions each workday for up to 10 weeks. The step length symmetry ratio is the primary outcome. Blinded assessors conduct outcome assessments at baseline, every 2 weeks during the intervention period, immediately post intervention and at 3-month follow-up. This study aims to provide preliminary evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of MFES-assisted gait rehabilitation early after stroke. Results will inform the design of a larger multi-centre trial. This trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (number NTR4762 , registered 28 August 2014).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 43 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Engineering 11 8%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 52 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,461,423
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#24
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,248
of 334,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.