You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The challenge of equipoise: qualitative interviews exploring the views of health professionals and women with multiple ipsilateral breast cancer on recruitment to a surgical randomised controlled feasibility trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-022-01007-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenny Ingram, Lucy Beasant, John Benson, Adrian Murray Brunt, Anthony Maxwell, James Richard Harvey, Rosemary Greenwood, Nicholas Roberts, Norman Williams, Debbie Johnson, Zoe Winters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,720,444
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#676
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,253
of 443,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#44
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.