You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adverse effects of delayed antimicrobial treatment and surgical source control in adults with sepsis: results of a planned secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03901-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hendrik Rüddel, Daniel O. Thomas-Rüddel, Konrad Reinhart, Friedhelm Bach, Herwig Gerlach, Matthias Lindner, John C. Marshall, Philipp Simon, Manfred Weiss, Frank Bloos, Daniel Schwarzkopf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,013,059
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#784
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,636
of 451,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.