You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional polysaccharides of carob fruit: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13020-019-0261-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bao-Jie Zhu, Mohamed Zaky Zayed, Hua-Xu Zhu, Jing Zhao, Shao-Ping Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 36 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,581,170
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#27
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,409
of 362,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.