↓ Skip to main content

Tidal volume significantly affects oxygenation in healthy pigs during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tidal volume significantly affects oxygenation in healthy pigs during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional ventilation
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12938-022-00984-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karel Roubík, Jakub Ráfl, Martin Rožánek, Petr Kudrna, Mikuláš Mlček

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,623,687
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#429
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,095
of 518,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.