You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meeting Report: Hackathon-Workshop on Darwin Core and MIxS Standards Alignment (February 2012)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.3166513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Éamonn Ó. Tuama, John Deck, Gabriel Dröge, Markus Döring, Dawn Field, Renzo Kottmann, Juncai Ma, Hiroshi Mori, Norman Morrison, Peter Sterk, Hideaki Sugawara, John Wieczorek, Linhuan Wu, Pelin Yilmaz |
| Abstract |
The Global Biodiversity Information Facility and the Genomic Standards Consortium convened a joint workshop at the University of Oxford, 27-29 February 2012, with a small group of experts from Europe, USA, China and Japan, to continue the alignment of the Darwin Core with the MIxS and related genomics standards. Several reference mappings were produced as well as test expressions of MIxS in RDF. The use and management of controlled vocabulary terms was considered in relation to both GBIF and the GSC, and tools for working with terms were reviewed. Extensions for publishing genomic biodiversity data to the GBIF network via a Darwin Core Archive were prototyped and work begun on preparing translations of the Darwin Core to Japanese and Chinese. Five genomic repositories were identified for engagement to begin the process of testing the publishing of genomic data to the GBIF network commencing with the SILVA rRNA database. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 34% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#579
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,056
of 191,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.